Difference Between Hashgraph And Blockchain


Blockchain is a decentralized and immutable ledger technology that uses a chain of blocks to record transactions. Each block contains a group of transactions, and blocks are linked together chronologically, forming a chain.

The most common consensus mechanism in blockchain is Proof of Work (PoW), although there are others like Proof of Stake (PoS). PoW involves miners solving complex mathematical puzzles to validate transactions and add them to the blockchain. PoS relies on validators who are chosen to create new blocks based on their stake in the network.

In blockchain, transactions are validated by miners (PoW) or validators (PoS) who compete to solve the puzzle. Once a transaction is confirmed, it is added to a block, and the block is added to the chain.

Blockchain networks can face scalability challenges due to the sequential nature of block addition. As the network grows, transaction confirmation times can increase, and fees may become more expensive.

Blockchain is known for its robust security due to the cryptographic algorithms used to secure transactions and the decentralized nature of the network. A consensus mechanism like PoW also makes it resistant to attacks.


Hashgraph is a distributed ledger technology designed to provide a fast, secure, and fair platform for decentralized applications. It was invented by Dr. Leemon Baird and introduced by the company Swirlds, which later became Hedera Hashgraph.

Hashgraph uses a consensus mechanism called “Gossip about Gossip” and “Virtual Voting.” In this mechanism, nodes gossip (share) information about transactions with each other. Over time, nodes reach consensus on the order of transactions by considering which transactions they have seen and when they saw them.

Transactions in Hashgraph are validated through the gossip protocol. Nodes don’t compete to solve puzzles; instead, they collaborate to agree on the transaction order. This can result in very fast transaction confirmation times.

Unlike traditional blockchain, Hashgraph employs a DAG structure, where transactions are not grouped into blocks. Instead, each transaction references one or more previous transactions, forming a directed acyclic graph. This structure allows for parallel processing of transactions and potentially higher scalability.

Hashgraph claims to achieve a high level of security through its consensus algorithm, which is designed to be asynchronous Byzantine fault-tolerant. This means the network can reach consensus even in the presence of malicious nodes and without requiring strict time synchronization.

Hashgraph is known for its ability to confirm transactions quickly. Since nodes in the network don’t need to wait for block confirmation, transactions can be processed rapidly, potentially making it suitable for applications where low latency is crucial.

Hashgraph And Blockchain: Key Differences

Consensus MechanismAsynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerance (aBFT) consensus algorithm, which doesn’t require mining.Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Stake (PoS), or other consensus mechanisms that involve mining or staking.
Transaction ValidationTransactions are validated individually and concurrently.Transactions are validated sequentially in blocks.
ScalabilityHigh scalability due to parallel transaction processing.Scalability challenges, with transaction confirmation times increasing as the network grows.
SecurityOffers strong security with aBFT consensus and gossip protocol.Security depends on the consensus mechanism, with PoW being energy-intensive and PoS having its own security considerations.
SpeedVery fast with transaction finality in seconds or less.Slower confirmation times, typically measured in minutes for Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Energy EfficiencyHighly energy-efficient as it doesn’t involve resource-intensive mining.PoW blockchains like Bitcoin consume significant energy. PoS blockchains are more energy-efficient.
ForkingNo forks in Hashgraph. All transactions are ordered without contention.Forks can occur in blockchains, leading to the creation of multiple chains with different transaction histories.
Data PrivacySupports private and permissioned networks.Public blockchains are transparent, but private blockchains can offer some degree of privacy.
Consensus FinalityProvides strong consensus finality with immediate transaction confirmation.Blockchains have probabilistic finality, and it may take several confirmations to consider a transaction irreversible.
Node RequirementsNodes in Hashgraph do not require extensive computational resources.Nodes in PoW blockchains require powerful hardware for mining, while PoS nodes require stake to participate.
Leader SelectionHashgraph uses a round-robin mechanism for leader selection.Blockchain may use various methods for leader selection, such as PoW mining or PoS staking.
Smart ContractsSupports smart contracts but may have limitations in complex computations.Supports smart contracts with varying levels of complexity depending on the platform (e.g., Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain).
Transaction FeesTransaction fees are typically lower and more predictable.Transaction fees can vary widely and may increase during network congestion.
Community GovernanceGovernance models vary but may involve token holders making decisions.Governance models can also vary, with some blockchains utilizing on-chain voting or off-chain governance.
Use CasesSuited for various use cases, including supply chain management, finance, and gaming.Commonly used for cryptocurrencies but expanding into supply chain, identity, and more.